Bicknell v. Garrett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This is a superadded liability action brought by the receiver of an insolvent Michigan bank, hereinafter called the bank, against the defendants, Jessie Ring Garrett and her husband. Relief, however, is sought against Mrs. Garrett only, as the owner of fifty shares of the stock of the bank, and she will be referred to throughout as the defendant or respondent.
The assessment was made on September 5, 1934, and the suit was commenced in October, 1937, more than three, but less than six, years thereafter. The defendant relied upon the statute of limitations as a defense to the action. The facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Christopher v. NorvellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Hitchcock v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.