Legal Opinion

Kersten v. Continental Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 21, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4658PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, Continental Bank. The plaintiffs’ complaint included four counts. Plaintiffs urge that granting the summary judgment was erroneous with respect to the first three counts. We will discuss those facts necessary to the resolution of each count as they become pertinent.

COUNT I

The plaintiffs owned Form-A-Top, Inc., an incorporated business. For the benefit of that business, they became involved in financing arrangements with Continental Bank. We will treat the interests of the plaintiffs as being…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Central Heat, Inc. v. Daily Olympian, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Costanzo v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  2. Matherly v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Spencer Companies v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  4. Double AA Builders, Ltd. v. Grand State Construction L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Darla Legg and Jason T. Legg, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. West BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API