Legal Opinion

Lively v. Tabor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for $24,588 with interest at six per cent per annum from April 3, 1917, claimed to be due under a written contract. This action was begun on March 27, 1925. The trial court found that suit was barred by the five-year Statute of Limitations (Sec. 862, R.S. 1929), and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.

The contract sued on was made November 20, 1915, and was entitled "Option Contract." The parties of the first part therein, H.M. Zimmerman and C.E. Elliott (both now deceased but hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, although present…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aiple-Hemmelmann Real Estate Co. v. SpelbrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Carter v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Gillen v. BayfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Parker-Washington Co. v. DennisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Warren v. CastelloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Baron v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York v. Livestock Market Insurance Agency, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Lusco v. TavitianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API