Legal Opinion

Maud v. Catherwood

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1945No. Civ. 12727PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in an' action for the partition of. real property situated in several counties. An agreed statement constitutes the record on appeal..The parties appearing in the trial court consisted of plaintiff, Louise C. Maud, a grandchild, and named as defendants, certain grandchildren, the trustees for certain other grandchildren, and two great grandchildren, descendants of S. Clinton Hastings, deceased, who at one time was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Iowa, and thereafter the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Pond v. BerghNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Careaga v. CareagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. HuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Estate of CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API