Newman v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*129Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We are asked to decide whether, in looking to the law of intestacy as a guide to a testator’s presumed intent when a will provision is ambiguous, a court should consider the law in effect at the time the will or testamentary trust was executed to determine if a child adopted out of a designated ancestor’s family is among the “issue” and “children” the testator intended to benefit, or should apply the law in effect at the death of the ancestor through whom the child may take. Appellant, minor A., a creditor of Jon E. Newman, claims that even though Newman was adopted by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cairns v. CairnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Gardenhire v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Estate of KailaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Della Sala v. Father Flanagan's Boys' HomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.