Copley v. Copley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, J.—
THE SYLLABUS
Here is the perplexing dilemma facing the trustees of an inter vivos trust when they are given broad powers but must exercise them in an atmosphere heavily laden with conflicting interests. The trustees are given voting control of substantially all the stock of Copley Press, Inc., a large newspaper which had been operated by the trustor as a one-man business. Helen Copley, widow of the trustor and co-trustee, is given broad powers of discretion and by the lead of her husband and counsel elected to continue the business as a family enterprise. The inter vivos…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Tamra Acorn, Rebecca Shwen, and Federer Holding Company, LLC, a Wyoming close limited liability company v. Lori Moncecchi and Dino MoncecchiWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Young v. Tri-City Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.