Legal Opinion

Copley v. Copley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1981No. Docket Nos. 18761, 22214PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLOGNE, J.—

THE SYLLABUS

Here is the perplexing dilemma facing the trustees of an inter vivos trust when they are given broad powers but must exercise them in an atmosphere heavily laden with conflicting interests. The trustees are given voting control of substantially all the stock of Copley Press, Inc., a large newspaper which had been operated by the trustor as a one-man business. Helen Copley, widow of the trustor and co-trustee, is given broad powers of discretion and by the lead of her husband and counsel elected to continue the business as a family enterprise. The inter vivos…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Tamra Acorn, Rebecca Shwen, and Federer Holding Company, LLC, a Wyoming close limited liability company v. Lori Moncecchi and Dino MoncecchiWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Young v. Tri-City Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API