Legal Opinion

State v. Aho

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1999No. 65656-8PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

975 P.2d 512 (1999)

137 Wash.2d 736

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Fonua AHO, Petitioner.

No. 65656-8.

Supreme Court of Washington.

Argued January 26, 1999.

April 22, 1999.

Douglas Stratemeyer, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Tod Bergstrom, Deputy, Seattle, for Respondent.

MADSEN, J.

Petitioner was convicted of three counts of first degree child molestation and one count of rape of a child. He claims his convictions for child molestation violate ex post facto prohibitions because the statute under which he was charged and under which the jury was instructed did not take…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API