Legal Opinion

Mader v. Health Care Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2003No. 72273-1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

We are called upon to determine whether Washington State’s health care authority properly determined that part-time community college instructors Eva Mader and Teresa Knudsen (petitioners) were ineligible for employer contributions to their health care coverage during the summer quarter in 1999. We hold that the Health Care Authority (HCA) erred in focusing on petitioners’job titles and quarterly contracts, instead of employing an individualized approach based on petitioners’ actual work circumstances, when determining their eligibility for employer contributions to their health care…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API