Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Tripp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2001No. 68362-0PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

— Gordon Tripp was involved in an automobile accident. He later agreed to accept a payment from the insurer of the person who caused the accident as full settlement of his claim against the tortfeasor. He did not, however, notify his insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty), before entering into the settlement agreement as he was required to do by a provision in his insurance contract. Liberty thereafter filed a declaratory judgment action against Tripp and his wife claiming that, because the Tripps did not notify Liberty of the settlement, they waived their right to recover…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. American Best Food v. Alea LondonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. American Best Food, Inc. v. Alea London, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. McIllwain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API