Legal Opinion

Maltaman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1987No. S.F. 25098PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*931Opinion

THE COURT.

The State Bar Court recommends that petitioner Joseph Paul Gauci Maltaman, a member of the State Bar since 1955, be disbarred. The referree made findings, adopted by the review department, that from 1976 to 1985, in two separate matters, petitioner violated his oath and duties as an attorney and committed acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty. He has no prior “formal” disciplinary proceedings.

The record generated by the State Bar Court suggests that substantial discipline is warranted, but it does not support the disbarment recommendation. Accordingly, we will impose…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Estate of FritschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States Department of Energy v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Baker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Carter v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API