Legal Opinion

Bice v. Stevens

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1955No. Civ. 20477PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs Richard J. Bice and Leila M Bice, appeal from a judgment for defendants rendered pursuant to an order granting defendants’ motion to exclude all evidence, followed by a denial of plaintiffs’ motion to amend to cure the alleged defects in their complaint.

The complaint is captioned “Rescission — Damages — Injunction.’’ It alleges fraud in an exchange of plaintiffs’ Glendora property known as the Daniel B. Motel for certain Ocean Boulevard property in Long Beach which the defendants James Stevens and Mabel Stevens claimed to own and which they did acquire and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Brown v. CritchfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Schultz v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API