Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 11, 1966No. 18,960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends he was deprived of a fair trial and a fair review of his conviction by command influence. The contention is based upon a lecture given by the Staff Judge Advocate, Fort Devens, Massachusetts, on March 20, 1965, to officers at the Post, some of whom were members of the court-martial which later tried him.

On April 27, 1965, before a general court-martial convened at Fort Dev-ens, the accused entered a plea of guilty to desertion, terminated by apprehension, escape from confinement, and breach of parole, in violation of Articles 85, 95,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. QuesinberryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. KitchensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. WrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API