Gouanillou v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
CERTIORARI to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding compensation. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
LENNON,
Certionary to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding compensation to an employee of petitioner for injuries sustained November 25, 1917. An application by the employee for adjustment of the claim to compensation was denied by the commission on March 11, 1919, upon the ground that the proceeding was barred by the statute of limitations prescribed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, [Stats. 1913, p. 279], the application having been filed on October 17, 1918, more than six months after the date of the injury. No steps to obtain a rehearing of this proceeding have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Childs v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Santa Clara Department of Social Services v. Cecilia M.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.