Childs v. Lanterman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
.Harrison,
The plaintiff brought this action to quiet her title to certain lands in the county of Los Angeles, making Roy S. Lanterman, the appellant herein, one of the defendants. An answer to the complaint was filed by Stephen M. White, as attorney for all the defendants, including the appellant, and upon a trial of the cause, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. When the action was commenced, and at the *390time of the trial, the appellant was an infant, and did not attain his majority until July 20, 1890. No order of court was made appointing a guardian ad litem for him, and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Fee v. Big Sand Iron Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1862
- Crowell v. GallowayNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- California Dental Assn. v. American Dental Assn.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Bank of America v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.