Legal Opinion

Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1921No. Civ. No. 2302PublishedCited by 35 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Plaintiff was given judgment for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (8 Fed. Stats. Ann., 2d ed., pp. 1208, 1339, etc.; IT. S. Comp. Stats., secs. 8657-8665) for the death of her husband, Harry Williams, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant while the deceased was in the discharge of his duties as brakeman on an interstate train of the defendant company.

Appellant does not contest the implied finding of negligence but earnestly contends that the deceased was not employed in interstaté commerce at the time of the injury resulting in his death. This…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API