Lovell v. Levin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Several Ohio taxpayers contend in these consolidated appeals that they should not be required to pay Ohio income tax on the income earned by trusts that they created. The Tax Commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) concluded, however, that the trusts’ income passed through the trusts and was taxable to the taxpayers themselves. That conclusion of the BTA was lawful, and we therefore affirm the BTA’s decision in each of the taxpayers’ cases.
Facts and Procedural History
Case No. 2007-0579
{¶ 2} Appellants Franklin and Melinda Lovell are a married couple who live in Cuyahoga…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KreischerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Renacci v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Greenscapes Home & Garden Prods., Inc. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- General Commodities Candy Tobacco, LLC v. Levin, 08ap-126 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008