Legal Opinion

Newman v. Levin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2008No. 2007-1054PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} On this appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”), we are asked to consider whether certain built-in equipment at the J.M. Stuart Electric Generating Station, located adjacent to the Ohio River in Adams County, is exempt from taxation as a thermal-efficiency improvement pursuant to former R.C. 5709.46. The Adams County auditor, Carroll E. Newman, has appealed from a decision of the BTA that affirmed the Tax Commissioner’s decision to exempt from taxation four types of equipment installed at the generating station, which is jointly owned by the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hatchadorian v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Norandex, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Global Knowledge Training, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Yanega v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Fogg-Akron Associates, L.P. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. NBC-USA Hous., Inc. — Five v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API