Legal Opinion

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. 92-1199PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

*197A

Specifying Error in the Notice of Appeal

In paragraph four of its notice of appeal filed with the BTA, MCI asserted that the commissioner’s application of R.C. 5727.10 to it denied it equal protection of the laws, and, in paragraph five, that the commissioner’s failure to apply the general personal property tax statute to it, R.C. 5711.22, also denied it equal protection. The commissioner, in her Proposition of Law No. Ill, asserts the notice of appeal was specific enough to challenge the statutes on their face but not specific enough to challenge them as applied to MCI. MCI, in its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kottel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marysville Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. Union County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re the Appeal of United Teleservices, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Murray & Co. Marina, Inc. v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API