Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Levin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} The Tax Commissioner contends that the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) lacked jurisdiction to reduce his valuation of certain personal property of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company (“Ohio Bell”). In modifying the commissioner’s valuation, the BTA relied on a theory of error that was not specified in Ohio Bell’s notice of appeal to the BTA. Therefore, we agree that the BTA lacked jurisdiction, and we reverse the decision of the BTA and reinstate the determination of the commissioner.
I
{¶ 2} Pursuant to statute, public utilities must pay property tax. The property tax is an ad valorem tax; the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newman v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- CNG Development Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Castle Aviation, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Cousino Construction Co. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Delaney v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Rover Pipeline, L.L.C. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- WCI Steel, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.