Legal Opinion

Manning v. Hart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1961No. 95PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNy, J.

The appellant poses these questions: (1) Did the court below err in reversing the order of the Clerk of the Superior Court, making Ruby Manning Jackson and Linda Gaskins Jackson parties defendant? (2) Did the court below err in sustaining the demurrer of plaintiff to the further answer of the defendant for affirmative relief, and in striking from the pleadings the further answer and defense of defendant Hart for affirmative relief?

In our opinion, these questions must be answered in the negative.

The appellant cites and relies upon Bullard v. Oil Co., 254 N.C. 756, 119 S.E. 2d 910, as authority…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Lynn v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Wrenn v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API