Legal Opinion

Bell v. Lacey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. 97PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

This appeal presents for determination this question: May one or more of the original defendants in a tort action, growing out of an automobile collision, maintain a cross-action against an original co-defendant for damages arising out of the same collision? According to the decisions of this Court the answer must be in the negative.

At common law, no right of contribution existed between or among joint tort-feasors who were in pari delicto. The right is purely statutory with us and its use necessarily depends upon the terms and provisions of the statute. G.S. 1-240; Potter v. Frosty Mom…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Godfrey v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Simpson v. PlylerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Manning v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Pearsall v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Hill v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API