Garrett v. Rose
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
The defendant undertakes to raise these questions on his appeal:
1. Did the judge err in denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings?
2. Did the judge err in striking from the answer the allegations concerning the contract of the grandchildren of David Williams for the division of the consideration to be paid by A. P. Petway for the remainder interests in the farm?
The first of these questions is not properly before us for the very simple reason that an immediate appeal does not lie from the denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Erickson v. Starling, 235 N.C. 643, 71 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Lassiter v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.