Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

1. Does the purchase of an equity of redemption at a judicial sale “subject tó and burdened with the lien” of mortgage or deed of trust, constitute an assumption by the purchaser of the indebtedness secured by such lien and imply a promise to pay the same ?

2. If not, what is the status of said purchaser of said equity of redemption with reference to the proceeds in the custody of the lien-holder derived solely from a prior sale of a portion of the mortgaged premises ?

The law answers the first question in the negative. The Supreme Court of California, in the case of Fontana Land Co. v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Crawford v. NimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ellis v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Brunswick Realty Co. v. University Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Consolidated Realty Corp. v. DunlopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. In Re the Will of AverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Parsons v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API