Legal Opinion

Brunswick Realty Co. v. University Inv. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1913No. 2473PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Son. George G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by the Brunswick Realty Company • against the University Investment Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an action in equity. Respondent is the assignee of the Salt Lake Security & Trust Company, hereafter called trust company. It brought the action January, 1910, to foreclose a mortgage originally given for $10,-000. The mortgage in question was payable in monthly installments of $250 each, and it was provided therein that, in case an installment should remain unpaid for a period of thirty days or more, the payee might declare the whole debt due and enforce payment thereof in an action of foreclosure. It is alleged in the complaint that the maker was in default and that when the action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Crawford v. NimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ahrens v. FentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. De Watteville v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Hilmes v. MoonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. First Southwestern Financial Services v. SessionsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API