In Re the Will of Averett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
Does the partition proceeding in Granville County preclude the petitioners from becoming caveators in Sampson County to set aside the will of Mrs. Marvin or Lottie Averett?
In order to arrive at a conclusion it is necessary to observe the chronology of facts. The caveators in the proceeding in Sampson County were the petitioners in the partition proceeding in Granville County and are the sole heirs at law of the alleged testatrix, Lottie Averett, and, if the caveat is successful, will inherit the land. The said land, of course, involved in this caveat proceeding is identically the same land…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ellis v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Holloman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Jenkins Bros. Shoe Co. v. G. v. Renfrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Owen v. . NeedhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re the Will of CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re the Will of LamanskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Burchett v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Bailey v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939