Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14029PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Proceeding to review the action of the Board of Governors of The State Bar.

Petitioner, on December 17, 192'7, at the time the State Bar Act went into effect, was a licensed attorney authorized to practice in the courts of this state. He paid his membership dues as prescribed in said act for a time. However, on November 22, 1929, the Board of Governors increased the annual dues from $5 to $7.50 and at about the same time imposed a penalty for delinquency in this payment of $3.

Petitioner paid neither the • dues nor the penalty for the year 1930. The two months’ notice prescribed by section 46…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Herron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re PlatzNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hoffman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API