Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. State Bar of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 2003No. A101491PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
Appellant Louis J. Hoffman, a resident of Arizona and member of the Arizona State Bar, practices law at his law firm in Scottsdale, Arizona. A patent law specialist, he does some election law work on a pro bono basis as well. Hoffman is also an active member of respondent State Bar of California (State Bar) and has practiced law in California on occasion. He wants to vote, and run, for respondent State Bar Board of Governors (Board), but he cannot. California law dictates that only active members of the State Bar who maintain their principal law offices in the respective…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT v. EmerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jauregui v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Briceno v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Briceno v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.