Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2007No. Docket 130379PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether a notice provision applicable to the defective highway exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1404(1), should be enforced as written. This statute provides in pertinent part:

As a condition to any recovery for injuries sustained by reason of any defective highway, the injured person, within 120 days from the time the injury occurred,... shall serve a notice on the governmental agency of the occurrence of the injury and the defect. The notice shall specify the exact location and nature of the defect, the injury sustained and the names of the witnesses…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API