Hagerman v. Gencorp Automotive
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave to appeal to examine the Legislature’s use of the phrase “proximate cause” in MCL 418.375(2); MSA 17.237(375)(2), which provides for survivor’s benefits under the worker’s compensation act.1 We decline to take up the cudgel with *723regard to the dissent’s scholarly exploration of the evils of judicial legislation or to reconsider the holding in Dedes v Asch, 446 Mich 99; 521 NW2d 488 (1994).2 Because the circumstances of decedent’s *724death were within the range of compensable consequences under subsection 375(2), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Davis v. ThorntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.