Legal Opinion

Hagerman v. Gencorp Automotive

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1998No. 107059, Calendar No. 8PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We granted leave to appeal to examine the Legislature’s use of the phrase “proximate cause” in MCL 418.375(2); MSA 17.237(375)(2), which provides for survivor’s benefits under the worker’s compensation act.1 We decline to take up the cudgel with *723regard to the dissent’s scholarly exploration of the evils of judicial legislation or to reconsider the holding in Dedes v Asch, 446 Mich 99; 521 NW2d 488 (1994).2 Because the circumstances of decedent’s *724death were within the range of compensable consequences under subsection 375(2), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Davis v. ThorntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API