Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
Two protests, one by each of the above-mentioned appellants, are involved in this case, but the issues raised thereby are the same and involve the interpretation of paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which we quote in full.
Furs dressed on the skin, excepting silver or black fox,furs, not advanced further than dyeing, 25 per centum ad valorem; plates and mats of dog and goat skins, 10 pier centum ad valorem; manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as material, joined or sewed together, including plates, linings,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- T. D. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Nylos Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Burroughs-Wellcome Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Neumann-Endler, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- United States v. Jules Raunheim Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.