American Express Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, T. D. 37791 (G. A. 8198). [Oral argument Mar. 27 and Oct. 21,1919, by Mr. Lane and Mr. Baldwin.]
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise here is sheets or plates of metal (by one witness referred to as “slabs” or '.'ingots”), 6 inches long, 3 inches wide, and about one-eighth of an inch in thickness, the content being 90 per cent platinum and 10 per cent iridium, artificially combined. The edges are rough. The upper and lower surfaces are smooth, as though hammered or rolled. Such pieces are parts of a larger product from which they have been cut before importation to satisfy the requirements of the importer. Sometimes this metal’ is imported in similar shapes 2 or 3 feet or more long and 3 or 4 inches or more…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- United States v. MacDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Todd & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.