Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Fur plates made of kidskins, imported at the port of New York, were classified by the collector as manufactures of furs further advanced than dyeing or dressing and prepared for use as material. The goods were accordingly assessed for duty at 40 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
1420. * * * manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as material, joined, or sewed together, including plates, linings, and crosses, except plates and mats of dog and goat…
2Cited by7 opinions
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Ehrenreich Photo-Optical Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Hutchinson Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.