United States v. Jules Raunheim Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge
The question in this case is whether certain “small, drilled pearls, temporarily strung on silk or cotton strings,” are dutiable as beads at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1403 of the Tariff Act of 1922, as assessed by the collector, or, as claimed in the protests, at 10 per centum or 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1429, or at 10 per centum or 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of said act.
*426The United States Customs Court sustained the protests, holding that the merchandise was properly dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1429.
Both parties…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Henry E. Frankenberg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.