Williams v. Schalk Chemical Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Respondent, plaintiff in this action, was employed by appellant as its sales manager under a written contract of employment for a term of one year from January 1, 1930, to December 31, 1930, at a fixed monthly salary plus a bonus. In December, 1930, a change was made by the corporation in its executive personnel, and a Mr. Col-year, vice-president of the corporation, was apparently substituted as its active executive head. In that month, respondent inquired of Colyear as to a renewal of the contract and was told: “I am really not in direct charge here now, but the only thing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Seches v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Dickinson v. Norwegian Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Loomis F.G. Assn. v. California F. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Caspary v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- McKeon v. GiustoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Mears v. JeffryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. KnorrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.