Legal Opinion

Williams v. Schalk Chemical Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1936No. Civ. 9744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Respondent, plaintiff in this action, was employed by appellant as its sales manager under a written contract of employment for a term of one year from January 1, 1930, to December 31, 1930, at a fixed monthly salary plus a bonus. In December, 1930, a change was made by the corporation in its executive personnel, and a Mr. Col-year, vice-president of the corporation, was apparently substituted as its active executive head. In that month, respondent inquired of Colyear as to a renewal of the contract and was told: “I am really not in direct charge here now, but the only thing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Seches v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dickinson v. Norwegian Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Loomis F.G. Assn. v. California F. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Caspary v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. McKeon v. GiustoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mears v. JeffryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. KnorrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API