Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Upshaw

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1952No. L. A. 22187PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Alexander E. Kelley loaned William A. and Othelia A. Upshaw $17,900. Thereafter, he entered into an agreement executed by the Upshaws and Cody W. Howarth which conditionally reduced the amount of the indebtedness and extended the time of payment. The appeal of Howarth presents for consideration questions concerning the rights of the respective parties under the extension agreement.

The complaint charged that in 1947, the Upshaws and Howarth jointly and severally became indebted to Kelley for $17,600 which they promised in writing to pay. They discharged part of their obligation, but refused…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API