Legal Opinion
McKeon v. Giusto
California Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1955No. S. F. 18963PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
In August, 1950, defendant orally agreed to employ plaintiff on a full time basis in his general contracting business. The agreement was put in writing in April, 1951, in the form of a letter from defendant to plaintiff, which provided:
“I hereby offer to employ you as an estimator and office manager in my general contracting business for a period of one year commencing January 1, 1951, and ending December 31, 1951, upon the following terms and conditions:
“1. I agree to pay you a salary of One Hundred Dollars ($100) per week, together with a sum which when added to the aforesaid salary will…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stewart Lamle v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rennick v. O.P.T.I.O.N. Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Pacific Grove-Asilomar Operating Corp. v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hotle v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Dalakow v. GeeryMontana Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.