Legal Opinion

Seches v. Bard

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13382PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petition for a transfer of this cause to this court was granted in order to give further consideration to the point raised by appellants that in part this action had been prematurely brought. Based on this contention the appellate court partially reversed the judgment of the trial court. Upon mature deliberation we are of the opinion that, as applied to the facts of this ease, the point is without merit.

It appears that the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Louis Bard, and plaintiff’s assignors, Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Bard, were engaged. jointly in various theatrical enterprises resulting in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hentsch v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Crain v. Electronic Memories and Magnetics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API