Legal Opinion
Fritz v. Arnold Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 22, 1975No. 44899PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal with prejudice entered in St. Louis County District Court following a jury verdict which found defendant not negligent. We affirm.
There is no serious dispute as to the facts giving rise to this appeal.
Defendant manufactured and sold a vehicle called a “Ranger X” tractor to the Minnesota Power and Light Company (MP & L). The Ranger X is a track-driven vehicle designed for use on rough terrain. It has a wheelbase of 46% inches, with a ground clearance of 16 inches.
Plaintiff was employed by MP & L as a dispatcher at the Hibbing,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Lundin v. StratmoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Antonson v. EkvallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Dorn v. Home Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dennie v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. ColschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Pedersen v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.