State v. Dumont
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged evidence of debt. OES 165.115. Violation of OES 165.115 is a felony. The crime involved unlawful use of a credit card. OES 165.295 (6). Violation of OES 165.295 (6) is a misdemeanor if the property obtained by the proscribed act is (as was the case here) of a value not to exceed $75. This case was well briefed by both counsel and in this opinion we borrow in large part from their briefs.
Defendant seeks reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in denying her motion to dismiss the indictment. This…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. PopielOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. PearsonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Lilly v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.