Legal Opinion
San Francisco Unified School District v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1971No. S.F. 22771PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this action for mandamus we are called upon to determine the interpretation and constitutionality of Education Code section 1009.5, which provides that “no governing board of a school district shall require any student or pupil to be transported for any purpose or for any reason without the written permission of the parent or guardian.” We hold that section 1009.5 does no more than prohibit a school district from compelling students, without parental consent, to use means of transportation furnished by the district; so construed, section 1009.5 violates no constitutional…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.