Legal Opinion
State v. Pearson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1968PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The state has appealed from a judgment for the defendant on a demurrer to the indictment.
The charging part of the indictment reads:
“The said LEON CLARENCE PEARSON on or about the 5th day of June, A.D. 1967, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon, did unlawfully and feloniously receive and conceal certain stolen property, to-wit, a Seattle First National Bank credit card, the personal property of Walter J. Koehler, the said LEON CLARENCE PEARSON having good reason to believe that the said personal property had theretofore been stolen, contrary to the Statutes in such cases made and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State of Oregon v. CoryOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Black v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BoyengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GledhillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. DumontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.