Legal Opinion
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 27, 2015No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge:
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing criminal charges against appellee Jeremy Matlock. We are asked to determine whether a registered qualifying patient under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA) is immune from prosecution pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2811(B)(3) for selling marijuana to another registered qualifying patient. For the following reasons, we reverse the dismissal and remand the case for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Matlock is a registered qualifying patient…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Heath v. KigerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Robert GearArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. LiwskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. KemmishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. McCcdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017