Legal Opinion
D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 4, 1993PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
For a second time we review the 1985 employment dispute between Richard D’Agostino and the Johnson & Johnson Corporation and certain of its employees (hereinafter J & J or J & J defendants). In 1989, we reviewed the contention of J & J that plaintiffs complaint should be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. J & J argued that New Jersey was an inconvenient forum for resolution of the dispute more properly brought in a Swiss court, because D’Agostino was a resident of Switzerland and had been employed by a Swiss subsidiary of J…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Peikin v. Kimmel & Silverman, P.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Heindel v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.