Legal Opinion
Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 13, 2004No. 03-2257PublishedCited by 537 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Richard Conoshenti alleges that his employment with Public Service Electric and Gas Company (“PSE & G”) was terminated in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., (“FMLA”), New Jersey public policy under Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J. 58, 72, 417 A.2d 505, 512 (N.J.1980), and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 10:5-1 et seq., (“NJLAD”). The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of PSE & G on all of Conoshenti’s claims. We will reverse the District Court’s judgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by537 opinions
- Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Edward Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Budhun v. Reading Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Erdman v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
532 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.