Legal Opinion
Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 26, 1998PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
STEIN, J.
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A 34:19-1 to -8 (CEPA), protects an employee from retaliatory action taken against him in New Jersey by his New Jersey employer because the employee objected to a practice that he reasonably believed was incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy designed to protect the public health and safety of citizens of another country. *166A threshold issue is whether the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to satisfy plaintiffs burden of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Velantzas v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Dzwonar v. McDevittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Patricia KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Roach v. Trw, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.