Legal Opinion
Heindel v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 7, 2004No. Civ.A. 02-3348(SRC)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, the Monsanto Company, Searle & Co., and Merck & Co., Inc. for summary judgment. The Court has opted to adjudicate this motion on the papers, and renders this opinion without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth more fully below, Defendants’ motion is granted, and summary judgment entered dismissing Plaintiffs complaint.
I. IntROduction
Plaintiffs in this matter are two consumers who suffer from pain associated with osteoarthritis…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Agostino v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- District 1199P Health & Welfare Plan v. Janssen, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.