Legal Opinion
Harber v. Lincoln
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 19, 1935No. 25824PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM.
Plaintiff in error instituted this suit in the superior court of Seminole county, Okla., in which he asked recovery upon a promissory note in the principal sum of $2,500, dated at Seminole, Okla., on April 23, 1930, due June 7, 1930, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum after maturity hearing the name of one Peter Lincoln, the defendant in error. The signature of Peter Lincoln is witnessed by Ruth Campbell, and the note on the reverse side bears a credit of $50 entered on 5-3-30 and bears the further indorsement “5-4-30, without recourse * * * W. A. ¡Bishop.” This note is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Baldridge v. SundaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- First Nat. Bank of Watonga v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Thompson v. CokerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Calabrese v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- United States v. CastilloDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1954
- Luker v. KellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966