Legal Opinion

United States v. Castillo

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided March 23, 1954No. Civ. A. 2295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

The plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action as assignee of a promissory note executed by the defendants, Nicanor Castillo and Felicita C. Castillo, and originally delivered to the A.B.C. Insulation Company in consideration for certain insulation work on defendants’ home. 1

The sole issue before the Court is whether the defendants have a valid defense of “fraud in the inception” which can be urged against the Government.

From the introduced evidence the Court finds the following facts:(1) The defendants, husband and wife, are of Spanish-Ameriean…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers' State Bank of Texhoma v. Clayton Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  2. CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lundean v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Mitchell County State Bank v. GrennanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Security Finance Co. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  3. Burchett v. Allied Concord Financial Corp.(Del.)New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. New Jersey Mortgage & Investment Co. v. DorseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API