Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Coker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1925No. 15401PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The parties to this action will be designated as they appeared in ithe trial court. The plaintiff, Charley Coker, 'brought his action against defendant, J. E. Thompson, to reform a contract, and for accounting of monies received by defendant for royalties and sale of certain lands. Plaintiff is a Creek Indian and heir of Emma Coker, deceased, and his petition alleges Emma Coker’s distributive share of the lands of the Creek Indian Tribe was the “N. W. % cf section 16, twp. 8 north, range 7 E. I. M.” That on April 15, 1915, the United States commenced its suit in behalf of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Stone v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. In Re Graham's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Pasley v. De WeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Stricker v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API