Legal Opinion
Calabrese v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1963No. Civ. 27160PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Action for rescission, damages, injunction and declaratory relief. Plaintiffs are relatives by blood or marriage of Samuel Ray Calabrese, 1 who directly or through corporations controlled by him 2 had purchased, between April 1, 1959, and May 9, 1960, four operating drug stores from Owl Drug Co. (a subsidiary of Rexall Drug & Chemical Company, later merged into it) and had given as consideration therefor six promissory notes upon which there was unpaid principal in the amount of $169,370 on March 1, 1961. Sam was personally liable on all of them and plaintiffs James, Samuel, Jr., and Mario…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. MatlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as a Receiver of United States National Bank v. Air Florida System, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Air Florida System, Inc., Counter-Claimant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Counter-Defendant. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as a Receiver of United States National Bank v. Air Florida System, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Martin v. Town & Country Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bencharsky v. Cottman Transmission Systems, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.